Resistant or restenotic lesions in complex PCI

Resistant or restenotic lesions in complex PCI

*

聯絡資訊

* 此欄位為必填

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*

通過指定您的聯繫原因,我們將能夠為您提供更好的服務。

We work with partners and distributors who may contact you about this Philips product on our behalf.

*
*

Final CEE consent

Tools for dealing with complex PCI


Resistant and restenotic lesions remain a challenge to the delivery of successful PCI, driving the need for advanced imaging tools to assess the lesion characteristics and specialty tools to treat the lesion. Philips cardiology solutions provide both detailed anatomic information and specialty therapeutic tools to assist in the treatment of these complex cases.

Support across the entire treatment pathway

Decide

IntraSight iFR Chart software

With OmniWire pressure guide wire, you can easily integrate iFR or FFR measurements into your daily PCI routines. iFR allows you to reduce cost, time, and patient discomfort versus FFR.5,6,7.

IVUS software image

IVUS Co-registration helps obtain insights to more easily plan stent diameter, length, and landing zones.

Guide

IntraSight iFR Coreg visual

iFR Co-registration can be used when the lesions are more complex and advanced insights are required by mapping the physiology gradients onto the angiogram.

Treat

ELCA

ELCA coronary laser atherectomy catheters are designed to cross, prepare and treat the most difficult coronary lesions.

Angio evo

New AngioSculpt Evo RX PTCA scoring balloon catheter

Highly deliverable scoring balloon, with the power to safely dilate resistant lesions.8,9,10

Confirm

IVUS monitor image

IVUS can be used to evaluate the result of the intervention and to verify whether additional treatment is needed.

1. Waldo, S. W., O’Donnell, C. I., Prouse, A., Plomondon, M. E., Rao, S. V., Maddox, T. M., Ho, P. M., & Armstrong, E. J. (2018). Incidence, procedural management, and clinical outcomes of coronary in-stent restenosis: Insights from the National VA CART Program. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 91(3), 425–433. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27161 

2. Bhatt D. Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis, Excerpt from Cardiovascular Intervention: A Companion to Braunwald’s Heart Disease. Philadelphia: Elsevier 2016:209-222. 

3. Cassese S, Byrne RA, Tada T, et al. Incidence and predictors of restenosis after coronary stenting in 10,004 patients with surveillance angiography.
Heart 2014; 100:153–9. 

4. Pratsos, A. (2009). Atherectomy and the role of excimer laser in treating CAD. Cardiac Interventions Today, January/February, 27-34. 

5. Davies JE, et al. DEFINE-FLAIR: A Multi- Centre, Prospective, International, Randomized, Blinded Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Cost Efficiencies of iFR and FFR Decision-Making for Physiological Guided Coronary Revascularization. New England Journal of Medicine, epub March 18, 2017. 

6. Gotberg M, et al., Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Versus Fractional Flow Reserve Guided Intervention (IFR-SWEDEHEART): A Multicenter, Prospective, Registry-Based Randomized Clinical Trial. New England Journal of Medicine, epub March 18, 2017. 

7. Patel M. “Cost-effectiveness of instantaneous wave-Free Ratio (iFR) compared with Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) to guide coronary revascularization decision-making.” Late-breaking Clinical Trial presentationat ACC on March 10, 2018. 

8. AngioSculpt Test Report SR-1571 (2008). 

9. Costa RA, Mooney MR, Teirstein PS, et al. Final results from the multi-center trial of the angiosculpt scoring balloon catheter for the treatment of complex coronary artery lesions Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine 7 (2006)81–126. 

10. Costa JR, Mintz GS, Carlier SG, et al. Nonrandomized comparison of coronary stenting under intravascular ultrasound guidance of direct stenting without predilation versus conventional predilation with a semi-compliant balloon versus predilation with a new scoring balloon. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:812-817. 

11. Généreux P, Madhavan MV, Mintz GS, Maehara A, Palmerini T, Lasalle L, Xu K, McAndrew T, Kirtane A, Lansky AJ, Brener SJ, Mehran R, Stone GW. Ischemic outcomes after coronary intervention of calcified vessels in acute coronary syndromes. Pooled analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) and ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) TRIALS. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 May 13;63(18):1845- 54. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.034. Epub 2014 Feb 19. PMID: 24561145. 

12. Ambrosini, V, et.al. Early outcomes of high energy laser (Excimer) facilitated coronary angioplasty on hard and complex calcified and balloon resistant coronary lesions: LEONARDO Study. Card. Revasc. Med 2015: 16: 141-146 and Luc Bilodeau, MD, et al. Novel Use of a High-Energy Excimer Laser Catheter for Calcified and Complex Coronary Artery Lesions. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions (62:155-161, 2004). 

13. Fitzgibbon GM et al. Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic follow-up of 5065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1388 patients during 25 years. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:616–26. 

You are about to visit a Philips global content page

Continue

You are about to visit a Philips global content page

Continue

使用最新版 Microsoft Edge、Google Chrome 或 Firefox 瀏覽本網站效果最佳。